Discussion board activities can serve a variety of purposes and help meet instructional objectives. Discussion topics and prompts should always relate to the course topic and involve reflection into a deeper layer of thinking beyond the surface level. In short, the key to managing a quality discussion forum where learning takes place is a fine art that will benefit from the application of the following suggested best practices for course facilitation:
1. Help your students to feel comfortable with you by creating a warm, friendly and personalized tone during the first week of class. Share some personal information with students about your background. Let them see what you look and sound like through a welcoming introduction video where you introduce yourself. Show sincere interest in who your students are and where they have been.
2. Offer discussion prompts that are creative, unique and engaging to encourage real interest in participation. Suggest that students use best practices such as sharing a personal story related to their line of work, asking open-ended questions, or sharing a related link or quote that relates to the topic.
3. Let your students carry the discussion as much as possible. If the conversation starts to wane or grow stagnant, use clever redirection methods to get it moving again by jumping in with a follow-up prompt. Always bring your focus back to the student and encourage them to think critically.
4. Always offer formative feedback at the end of each module of each student's discussion participation. Show them what they did right and what impressed you. Encourage them to take the discussion further next time and remind them to use a best practice for participating in discussions. Use gentle but productive suggestions in areas where they may improve over time.
5. Encourage students to participate in reflective activities such as journaling, blogging or filling out a reflection report about their learning experience each week. Reflection on discussion after it has ended will help to solidify any of the important lessons the student should take away from the experience. Teach your students how to apply what they have learned from building community to their academic or professional careers through analytical and critical reflection.
Topics in Online Education for Adult Learners
Monday, May 23, 2016
Friday, February 26, 2016
Final Thoughts on Assessment for e-Learning
3 Highlights of the Course:
- Learning how to use a blog. It was much much easier than I ever dreamed, so now I will use it regularly and for different reasons.
- Having Maggie as an instructor. Just sayin’, I really enjoyed getting to know her in an earlier course in the program, so this was equally as fun. She’s one smart lady!
- Learning how to write/create a rubric. I really didn’t know much about them even though I had seen them time and time again in my classes. It wasn’t nearly as simple as I had imagined, trying to figure out how to word things and what to put in each cube.
2 Things I Can Do Now:
- I know how to make a concept map on Popplet or Bubble.US. Years ago, I used mind-mapping free online software and it was a nightmare. The new Ipad concept maps are wonderful, easy to learn and full of fabulous opportunity for graphics.
- I can write FAR better objectives now that the instructor gave direct feedback and offered that online objective-making tool that helps you create them using the ABDC method.
1 Farewell Message of Gratitude:
My farewell messages is that I wish everybody luck in their online teaching adventures and hope that you all are hired or paid very well eventually to teach online courses. And, I look forward to seeing some of you in the next class, as I have never worked with a more educated and experienced group before this course.
Final Discourse Analysis Discussion
Looking back at an online discussion early in the Assessment for e-Learning course, I was surprised to read my words. It seems that as courses progress, I tend to change my discourse when I know the students more and become more detailed. I would definitely say that I am the Donald Trump type, as I always want to jump right into talking about a topic or issue and get to the point. And, I have so many ideas, insights and interpretations on a topic such as that one about the SAMR ladder that I always feel I am editing/cutting/editing my words. I am certainly the speaker in a group and enjoy being front and center with my discourse in a leader position instead of in a quiet, passive or follower position.
Qualities of my own discourse:
Intricate ideas
Clear
In-depth
Explanatory
Friendly
Visual details
Specifics
For teaching online in the future, some tones and elements that I may wish to alter in order to be more approachable include shorter and to the point, open and inviting and light on details. I am so used to writing fiction as a novelist that I feel always an urge to give details from all angles like describing a scene or setting. I would like to invite my students to speak more as I step back and don’t over-speak to them, while letting them fill in some of their own blanks. After all, it is a learning environment and too much speaking or 'telling' doesn't allow students room to explore the mystery or gaps on their own.
Monday, February 22, 2016
Final Reflection on Assessment in E-Learning's Final Project
Please take a
moment to read my insights about creating my final project for this course:
1. Creating
just another website or Weebly to host the project seems redundant or
repetitive to the website e-portfolio and also course toolbox we were to do. I wanted
to host my project on a full webpage with a web-layout but thought that some
variety was in order. Instead, I chose to use a Blog to host my project as an
experiment. Did it work? Different, but challenging, and yes!
2. The assessment
toolbox feels more to me like it should be qualified as something different
than the final project. The final project, to me, feels a sampling of work from
the course all put together to showcase what has been accomplished. A toolbox,
for me, feels more like a listing of resources to immediately click without having
to read too much.
3. Using a
blog for a final-project hosting site is somewhat unusual. I originally was
going to use a Weebly, but thought that was too standard (been there, done
that). I then started doing a Google Doc, and everything was laying out nicely
just like a fancy Word document in a linear fashion. I decided that if I am
going to do it in a linear layout anyway, that I may as well use a blog site to
host it online where people will have more convenient access. The linear design
is different, but still doable for something creative and ‘off the wall’.
Two insights about
my Goals from the Beginning of the Course:
1. Within the layers of the SAMR
ladder, my original goal was to be fully at the top level of redefinition where
most or all lessons/activities are centered around higher-order thinking
skills. I realized then that it isn’t so easy to always do this with studying
literature, and that I would have to learn new ways to guide students into
activities that explore connections of texts and deeper meanings beyond just
the entertainment value of reading the books. I wanted more application-related
creative projects, as I am a very creative person. I do feel that I came up
with quite a few creative projects in the development of my children’s
literature class through this course.
2. I originally fell between augmentation
and redefinition as the norm for me. For teaching literature online, I haven’t
had many opportunities to develop lessons or activities that fall under the redefinition
layer prior to this course. I now create activities, assessments and discussions
that provide more engagement and freedom to tie in learning with a creative
project and offers a personalized approach tailored toward the students. I now know
to use higher-order thinking skills when creating lessons and assessment, which
was not held in my awareness prior to this course.
One question
that I still have about Assessment in E-Learning:
1. With the new ‘modern’ focus on
formative assessment that is student-centered in online classrooms, is there
even room anymore to offer summative assessment (like inn the old days) with
quizzes, mid-terms and final exams? Should they be avoided all together?
Sunday, February 14, 2016
Applying Rubrics to Online Learning Assessments
Recommended
Assessment Technique 1:
The article Using
Rubrics to Promote Thinking and Learning states that instructional rubrics
provide students with more informative feedback about their strengths and areas
that need some improvement in a way that a traditional assessment cannot do
(Andrade, 2000). The purpose of using rubrics isn’t just to give students
structure to live up to, but to teach and support course objectives at the same
time. In my own online course development, I tend to allow students wiggle room
for creativity with their activities or projects. My original requirements were
not as specifically outlined as a rubric would be that also supports course
goals. Now, I intend to use rubrics that guide students in further applying
synthesis, creativity and responsibility skills as they prepare their
assessment projects at a higher degree of productivity.
Recommended
Assessment Technique 2:
After examing the article Cybercoaching Model Explained, I was reminded that it is important
to understand and distinguish between formative and summative assessment, with
formative assessment intended to adjust the instruction and learning in
response to the student’s performance while summative is mainly to evaluate
student mastery (Peterson, 2005). When reviewing these comparisons to the
application and use of rubrics for assessment, clarity in the form of
assessment and the purpose it serves is of utmost importance. If the assessment
is merely summative in the form of a multiple choice test, no rubric is
necessary. A mere grading scale would suffice, as there is no creation or
performance other than passive selection. For my own online course creation, I
have chosen to center my assessments on
formative models where accompanying rubrics support the objectives and teach
new skills to students as they practice them.
Three
things that I will adjust in my courses to reflect lessons learned from reading:
1. I will rarely, if every again, use traditional
summative assessments.
2. Rubrics will be used for individual projects that
involve design, creation or writing. Discussion postings and journal writings
will have guidelines posted in the syllabus.
3. My awareness will remain focused on each block in
my rubrics designed to directly or indirectly promote learning at the exemplary
level.
Two
insights I have about pre-course surveys and rubrics:
1. Using a precourse survey is optional, yet a very
good tool if the course is only partly developed. Feedback from students that
comes from a precourse survey can be used to design assignments, activities or
assessments later in the course.
2. Try to apply some variety to your rubrics. It’s ok
for some to be simple, short and sweet with others as long, detailed and
specific to expectation. Not all rubrics are the same.
One
question that I still have for the course is this:
What would be an average or standard amount of rubrics
to include in a course? With a longer 16-week course there will be many
assignments, activities and assessments. Would each one need a separate rubric
and how much is overkill?
Resources:
Andrade, Heidi G. (February 2000). Using Rubrics to Promote
Thinking and Learning. Educational Leadership. Volume 57, Number 5.
Petersen, Naomi. J. (February 25, 2005).
Cybercoaching: Rubrics, Feedback, and Metacognition, Oh my! From the E.C. Moore
Symposium “Putting Student Learning First.” Retrieved from
https://www2.uwstout.edu/content/profdev/assessonline762/PDF_files/Cybercoaching_paper.pdf
Thursday, February 4, 2016
Bloom's Taxonomy in Online Education
I would like
to share several valuable reflections and observations from learning about
Bloom’s Taxonomy this week:
1. Bloom’s
Taxonomy can be used for creating assessments. Previously, I thought that it
was only used when creating objectives.
2. Simply comprehending
or understanding material does not count for much value from a Bloom’s
standpoint. You have to take what you comprehend and apply it to something.
3. The
quality of student learning is shallow at best if you don’t move into the
higher-order thinking or bigger parts of the Bloom’s pyramid. In a way,
students are deprived of learning.
Two insights
I have about using Bloom’s Taxonomy:
1. I would
like to share my question and opinion on using the very “writing” or “to write”
as an action, as a Bloom’s action verb. If an assignment requires writing an
analysis paper, is the writing considered the higher-level verb? To me, writing
seems passive and is just an activity and not a verb that qualifies for Bloom’s structure.
Yet, I have seen people claim that it does count. Passive writing can occur
where no learning takes place.
2. There is a
difference between relating knowledge learned when making a presentation such
as PowerPoint or a Prezi, and actually learning something. Meaning, it is easy
to make a visual presentation of text and slides to show a viewer, but how to
we know the student has learned something beyond how to use the technology to
make it? Students must make connections to materials in their presentations,
visually demonstrating patterns through analysis, interpretation and
classifying what they share.
One question that
I still have about Bloom’s Taxonomy:
1. When it comes to using Bloom’s
Taxonomy for higher-level thinking and choosing or designing assessments, how
much of an assessment should be based on the higher parts of the pyramid such
as the analyzing, creating or synthesizing, and beyond just the comprehension
and understanding?
Sunday, January 31, 2016
Working on Teams in an Online Setting
Entering the
end of week 4 in our Assessments in e-Learning graduate course, I would like to
share three of my reflections and observations from that material explored:
1. I learned
how to make a Weebly. Simple, but significant. I am a tech geek. Whereas I have
built websites using more complicated software, I never knew about Weebly until
now.
2. I learned
what the jigsaw method for collaborative team assessment means. Another term
and method I was unfamiliar with. I now believe that all online courses should
utilize at least one jigsaw activity as a requirement for completion.
3. Regarding
assessment, I learned that projects can function in this role as more beneficial
than something like an analysis paper or midterm exam. A project, be it done
alone or on a team, applies the use of skills learned through the creativity
process. Learning takes place when creativity happens, as the imagination (right
brain) works symbiotically with the rationale logic (left brain) and new
pathways are formed. Learning at its best.
1. Working
with teams on collaborative projects can be challenging. You never know who you
will get on your team and most likely it is somebody you don’t know. A small
amount of trust is necessary. You have to assume that these are all working
adults who are paying hard-earned money for their courses. They wouldn’t be in the
course if they didn’t plan on doing the work. They may not respond as quick as
you’d like, yet in the end you must trust they will get it done.
2. Learning
via collaborate team projects is a great way to practice William Horton’s
Absorb-Do-Connect method for enacting course objectives. Whatever the material
presented is about (absorb), the students get to work on a team and practice
(do) hands-on activities of whatever the focus of the content. As they are working
on this project, this ‘do’, they are also connecting. It is the connection that
helps open portals to different parts of the mind where patterns are seen,
analysis happens and the ‘absorb’ content comes to life through direct action.
One suggestion
I have for working on teams in an online setting:
My advice for working on teams in an online setting would be
to put all of your focus on communication. The majority of problems that occur
on teams ties back to communication issues. Team members don’t receive emails, don’t
respond promptly to emails or don’t write very long emails compared to others
sometimes. I suggest that a team leader make a schedule at the beginning of the
project with due dates for each step along the way during the project. Every
member can receive a copy of it and see clearly what the expectations are. With
a clear step-by-step schedule even for the small things, it removes some of the
pressure of wondering if a team member will respond or do their share.
Communication is what it’s all about.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)